In re Dillon
This text of 222 A.D. 772 (In re Dillon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Final order dismissing certiorari proceeding unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The petitioner has mistaken her remedy. If the present classification under the present ordinance is unreasonable, discriminatory or confiscatory, it would seem that her proper course should be to apply for a permit to erect the desired apartment house, and, in the event of its denial, to seek by mandamus its issuance, attacking the present classification as unreasonable. [773]*773(Matter of Isenbarth v. Bartnett, 237 N. Y. 617.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D. 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dillon-nyappdiv-1927.