In re Dietzel

55 N.Y.S. 1139

This text of 55 N.Y.S. 1139 (In re Dietzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Dietzel, 55 N.Y.S. 1139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

No opinion. In order to decide this motion, the court must be informed of the character of the appeal,—whether the proceedings originated in the supreme court, and the decision to be reviewed is that of a referee, who has determined all the issues; or whether the case comes up from the surrogate’s court upon appeal from a decree of the surrogate confirming the referee’s report. Counsel should submit a copy of the judgment, order, or decree appealed from, together with a copy of the notice of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 N.Y.S. 1139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dietzel-nyappdiv-1898.