In Re Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability Litigation

133 F. App'x 832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability Litigation. Read the opinion of the Court — 401 F.3d 143
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 8, 2005·No. 04-3928·Unpublished

Opinion

*833 OPINION OF THE COURT

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge.

In order to register for benefits under the Settlement Agreement in the Diet Drug Class Actions, appellant Deborah Badarzynski was required to return her Blue Form to the AHP Settlement Trust (“Trust”) by May 3, 2003. She did not do this until November 21, 2003. Applying the “excusable neglect” standard set forth in Pioneer Inv. Serv. Co. v. Brunswick Assoc. Ltd., 507 U.S. 380, 113 S.Ct. 1489, 123 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993), the District Court concluded that Badarzynski’s untimely filing was not attributable to such neglect. We find the analysis set forth in its opinion persuasive and cannot say that the District Court abused its discretion. 1

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

1

. Ms. Badarzynski had actual notice of the deadline for registration and learned ten days before the deadline that her attorney may have failed to effectuate her registration as she intended. She nevertheless waited over six months to advise the Trust of her desire to register. Thus, this case is far different from In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Prods. Liab. Litig., 246 F.3d 315 (3d Cir.2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability Litigation, 133 F. App'x 832 (3d Cir. 2005).

133 F. App'x 832 (In Re Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability Litigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related