In re Dielsi

New York Supreme Court

In re Dielsi

135 Misc. 672

DecidedNovember 15, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 135 Misc. 672 (In re Dielsi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dielsi, 135 Misc. 672 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Callahan, J.

The applicant herein was absent from the United ■ States from December 6, 1925, to October 2, 1926, more than six months but less than a year. A consideration of his testimony on the hearing of his petition satisfies me that he has overcome any presumption that may have been created against him by more than six months’ absence. (U. S. Code, tit. 8, § 382, as amd.; 34 U. S. Stat. at Large, 596, as amd. by 45 id. 1513, approved March 2, 1929, in effect July 1,1929.) I accordingly admit him to citizenship.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Callahan, J.

The applicant herein was absent from the United ■ States from December 6, 1925, to October 2, 1926, more than six months but less than a year. A consideration of his testimony on the hearing of his petition satisfies me that he has overcome any presumption that may have been created against him by more than six months’ absence. (U. S. Code, tit. 8, § 382, as amd.; 34 U. S. Stat. at Large, 596, as amd. by 45 id. 1513, approved March 2, 1929, in effect July 1,1929.) I accordingly admit him to citizenship.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 Misc. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dielsi-nysupct-1929.