In re Dickens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Dickens

226 A.D. 853, 234 N.Y.S. 776

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1929·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for dismissal of the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from an interlocutory judgment in condemnation proceedings. (See Condemnation Law, §§ 19 and 20; Stillwater, etc., R. R. Co. v. B. & M. R. R. Co., 67 App. Div. 367; appeal dismissed, 170 N. Y. 573; Village of St. Johnsville v. Smith, 61 App. Div. 380; County of Orange v. Storm King Stone Co., 180 id. 208, 210.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for dismissal of the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from an interlocutory judgment in condemnation proceedings. (See Condemnation Law, §§ 19 and 20; Stillwater, etc., R. R. Co. v. B. & M. R. R. Co., 67 App. Div. 367; appeal dismissed, 170 N. Y. 573; Village of St. Johnsville v. Smith, 61 App. Div. 380; County of Orange v. Storm King Stone Co., 180 id. 208, 210.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

In re Dickens, 226 A.D. 853, 234 N.Y.S. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

226 A.D. 853 (In re Dickens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related