In re Dickens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Dickens

226 A.D. 853, 234 N.Y.S. 776

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 226 A.D. 853 (In re Dickens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dickens, 226 A.D. 853, 234 N.Y.S. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for dismissal of the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from an interlocutory judgment in condemnation proceedings. (See Condemnation Law, §§ 19 and 20; Stillwater, etc., R. R. Co. v. B. & M. R. R. Co., 67 App. Div. 367; appeal dismissed, 170 N. Y. 573; Village of St. Johnsville v. Smith, 61 App. Div. 380; County of Orange v. Storm King Stone Co., 180 id. 208, 210.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for dismissal of the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from an interlocutory judgment in condemnation proceedings. (See Condemnation Law, §§ 19 and 20; Stillwater, etc., R. R. Co. v. B. & M. R. R. Co., 67 App. Div. 367; appeal dismissed, 170 N. Y. 573; Village of St. Johnsville v. Smith, 61 App. Div. 380; County of Orange v. Storm King Stone Co., 180 id. 208, 210.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 A.D. 853, 234 N.Y.S. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dickens-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack