In re Díaz
16 P.R. 744
Opinion
As this court recognizes the right of the petitioner to appear before any of the courts of this Island in defense of his' own rights, and as it does not appear that such right has been denied him, in view of the decision of the Supreme [745] Court of California in the case of Philbrook v. Superior Court, 111 Cal., 31, and that of this court in the case of Agustín Hernández Mena v. The District Court of Mayagüez (15 P. R. Rep., 251), of May 7, 1909, the authorization requested is considered unnecessary and the petition is denied.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Díaz, 16 P.R. 744 (prsupreme 1910).
16 P.R. 744 (In re Díaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Philbrook v. Superior Court
43 P. 402 (California Supreme Court, 1896)