In re Diana V.
297 A.D.2d 535, 746 N.Y.2d 902, 746 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8379
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 17, 2002·Published
Opinion
Appellant, 15 years old at the time, admitted having hit a teacher during an altercation in the gym on February 27, 2001. This act would constitute a misdemeanor assault.
Family Court cannot be said to have improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the application for an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (Matter of Nikkia C., 187 AD2d 581). Nor did the court err in ordering probation (Family Ct Act § 353.2). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Diana V., 297 A.D.2d 535, 746 N.Y.2d 902, 746 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 535 (In re Diana V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Nikkia C.
187 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)