In re Diana V.

297 A.D.2d 535, 746 N.Y.2d 902, 746 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8379

This text of 297 A.D.2d 535 (In re Diana V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Diana V., 297 A.D.2d 535, 746 N.Y.2d 902, 746 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Appellant, 15 years old at the time, admitted having hit a teacher during an altercation in the gym on February 27, 2001. This act would constitute a misdemeanor assault.

Family Court cannot be said to have improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the application for an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (Matter of Nikkia C., 187 AD2d 581). Nor did the court err in ordering probation (Family Ct Act § 353.2). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Nikkia C.
187 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 535, 746 N.Y.2d 902, 746 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-diana-v-nyappdiv-2002.