In re Diana P.
49 A.D.3d 390, 852 N.Y.2d 838
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 2008·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
[391]*391The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent rather than a person in need of supervision (see e.g. Matter of Rosemary R., 29 AD3d 309 [2006]), in view of her violent conduct toward her father in the underlying incident, as well as appellant’s history of violent behavior at school and truancy problems. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Diana P., 49 A.D.3d 390, 852 N.Y.2d 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 390 (In re Diana P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Kaylynn M.
143 A.D.3d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Nazaray McK.
123 A.D.3d 480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)