in Re Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and Diamond Offshore Drilling Limited
Opinion
Opinion issued January 28, 2014.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00966-CV ——————————— IN RE DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING LTD., Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This proceeding arises from a personal injury sustained by Bruce Masson,
the real party in interest, alleged to have occurred during his employment on a
drilling rig temporarily docked at a Malaysian port. Diamond Offshore Drilling,
Inc. and Diamond Offshore Drilling, Ltd., the relators, seek mandamus relief from the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their motion to dismiss for forum non
conveniens.1
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. All pending motions are denied
as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.
1 The Honorable Elizabeth Ray, Judge of the 165th District Court of Harris County is the respondent. The underlying case is Bruce Masson v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and Diamond Offshore Drilling, Ltd., No. 2012- 21768, in the 165th District Court, Harris County, Texas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and Diamond Offshore Drilling Limited (in Re Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and Diamond Offshore Drilling Limited) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.