In re Diamond

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Diamond

53 A.3d 1229, 212 N.J. 329, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1062

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 24, 2012·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that HOWARD S. DIAMOND of MENDHAM, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year effective November 1, 2005, by Order of this Court filed October 7, 2005, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that HOWARD S. DIAMOND shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics until the further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that HOWARD S. DIAMOND of MENDHAM, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year effective November 1, 2005, by Order of this Court filed October 7, 2005, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that HOWARD S. DIAMOND shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics until the further Order of the Court.

In re Diamond, 53 A.3d 1229, 212 N.J. 329, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1062 (N.J. 2012).

Pincite

53 A.3d 1229 (In re Diamond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.