In re Dezao

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Dezao

913 A.2d 801, 189 N.J. 125

DecidedJanuary 19, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 913 A.2d 801 (In re Dezao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dezao, 913 A.2d 801, 189 N.J. 125 (N.J. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision 06-237, concluding that JAMES C. DeZAO, III, of PAR-SIPPANY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be admonished for violating of RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

[126]*126ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision 06-237, concluding that JAMES C. DeZAO, III, of PAR-SIPPANY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be admonished for violating of RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

[126]*126ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

913 A.2d 801, 189 N.J. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dezao-nj-2007.