In re Dezao

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Dezao

913 A.2d 801, 189 N.J. 125

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 19, 2007·Published

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision 06-237, concluding that JAMES C. DeZAO, III, of PAR-SIPPANY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be admonished for violating of RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

[126] ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision 06-237, concluding that JAMES C. DeZAO, III, of PAR-SIPPANY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be admonished for violating of RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

[126] ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In re Dezao, 913 A.2d 801, 189 N.J. 125 (N.J. 2007).

Pincite

913 A.2d 801 (In re Dezao) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.