in Re Devon Morris
This text of in Re Devon Morris (in Re Devon Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: In re Devon Morris
Appellate case numbers: 01-20-00084-CR, 01-20-00085-CR
Trial court case numbers: 1645948, 1645949
Trial court: 262nd District Court of Harris County
The petition for writ of mandamus filed by relator, Devon Morris, does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it fails to include an appendix that contains “a certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of,” and because it lacks citations to “competent evidence” to support “every statement of fact in the petition.” TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), (g). The petition also fails to comply with the form requirements in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4. In addition, the petition does not indicate that the trial court was asked to perform a non- discretionary act and refused to do so. See O'Connor v. First Court of Appeals, 837 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Tex. 1992) (“Mandamus will issue when there is a legal duty to perform a non-discretionary act, a demand for performance, and a refusal.”). Accordingly, we strike the petition. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: ____________/s/ Russell Lloyd__________ Acting individually
Date: January 30, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Devon Morris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-devon-morris-texapp-2020.