In re Devine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Devine

81 A.D.2d 873, 440 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11569

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 13, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 873 (In re Devine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Devine, 81 A.D.2d 873, 440 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion by petitioner to suspend the respondent from the practice of law until such times as said respondent submits to an examination by a physician and/or psychiatrist, and satisfactory proof be submitted to indicate recovery from any disability affecting him. Cross motion by respondent to direct that the petition be resubmitted for another hearing de novo. Cross motion denied; motion granted and pursuant to rules of this court (22 NYCRR 691.13 [b] [1]), the respondent is suspended forthwith from the practice of law until he submits himself in order to be examined by Naomi Goldstein, M. D., and he shall remain suspended until he submits satisfactory proof to indicate recovery from any disability from which she may find that he now suffers and until the further order of this court. Mollen, P.J., Damiani, Titone, Lazer and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion by petitioner to suspend the respondent from the practice of law until such times as said respondent submits to an examination by a physician and/or psychiatrist, and satisfactory proof be submitted to indicate recovery from any disability affecting him. Cross motion by respondent to direct that the petition be resubmitted for another hearing de novo. Cross motion denied; motion granted and pursuant to rules of this court (22 NYCRR 691.13 [b] [1]), the respondent is suspended forthwith from the practice of law until he submits himself in order to be examined by Naomi Goldstein, M. D., and he shall remain suspended until he submits satisfactory proof to indicate recovery from any disability from which she may find that he now suffers and until the further order of this court. Mollen, P.J., Damiani, Titone, Lazer and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 873, 440 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-devine-nyappdiv-1981.