In re Desmond S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Desmond S.

285 A.D.2d 994, 727 N.Y.S.2d 679, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6996

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 3, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 A.D.2d 994 (In re Desmond S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Desmond S., 285 A.D.2d 994, 727 N.Y.S.2d 679, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent contends that Family Court erred in placing him on probation for a period of two years. Respondent expressed his desire that the court impose a one-year term of probation, rather than the two-year term that the court indicated it would impose. The court then inquired whether respondent wanted to proceed with a dispositional hearing, and respondent stated that he did not wish to do so. Thus, we conclude that respondent consented to the disposition, and no appeal lies from an order entered upon consent (see, Matter of Cherilyn P., 192 AD2d 1084, lv denied 82 NY2d 652). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Rollout, J. — Juvenile Delinquency.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Pine, Scudder and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent contends that Family Court erred in placing him on probation for a period of two years. Respondent expressed his desire that the court impose a one-year term of probation, rather than the two-year term that the court indicated it would impose. The court then inquired whether respondent wanted to proceed with a dispositional hearing, and respondent stated that he did not wish to do so. Thus, we conclude that respondent consented to the disposition, and no appeal lies from an order entered upon consent (see, Matter of Cherilyn P., 192 AD2d 1084, lv denied 82 NY2d 652). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Rollout, J. — Juvenile Delinquency.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Pine, Scudder and Burns, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D.2d 994, 727 N.Y.S.2d 679, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-desmond-s-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack