in Re Descon Construction, L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 4, 2015·No. 04-15-00276-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED

04-15-00276-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

5/4/2015 9:23:55 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

04-15-00276-CV _

NO. ______________

INRE: § IN THE FOURTH FILED IN § 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

DESCON CONSTRUCTION, L.P., § COURT OF APPEALS 5/4/2015 9:23:55 PM

§ KEITH E. HOTTLE Relator. § Clerk SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

RELATOR'S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY

Relator asks the Court for an emergency stay of the trial and proceedings in the

District Court. This case is set for trial on the trial court's docket on May 11, 2015 at 9:00

a.m. Therefore, Relator respectfully requests that this Court waive the ten day period for

considering motions pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 10.3(3) and issue a ruling granting stay on

or before May 8, 20 15.

A. Introduction

1. Relator is Descon Construction, L.P.; real party interest is Rio Grande City

Consolidated Independent School District.

2. Respondent is The Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding in the 229th

Judicial District Court of Starr County, Texas.

3. Real Party in Interest, Rio Grande City Consolidated Independent School

District, filed suit against Des con Construction, L.P. in the 229th Judicial District, Starr

County, Texas, in the case styled Rio Grande City Consolidated Independent School District

v. Descon Construction L.P., Cause No. DC-14-46.

4. Relator attaches a certificate of compliance certifYing that on May 4, 2015, they

notified Real Party in Interest by telephone that a motion for temporary relief would be filed.

I

Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a). This motion is being served on Real Party in Interest and

Respondent electronically contemporaneously with the filing of this motion.

5. Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, served on both the Real Party

in Interest and Respondent, establishing its right to mandamus relief based on Respondent's

orders which allowed Real Party in Interest to name six new individuals and entities as

defendants a week before trial, despite the fact that none of the newly named individuals and

entities have been served and are not before the Court.

Respondent has been notified that underlying counsel does not represent the newly

added parties and that there may be a conflict between the parties. Nonetheless, the Court

ordered counsel for Relator to provide information regarding those entities on one hour'

notice without having the opportunity to contact counsel for any of the entities. It is believed

that similar demands would be made on issues including disclosure of evidence and securing

the witnesses for trial. Respondent denied Relator's motion to abate or motion for

continuance so that service could be had and counsel for the entities could appear.

Trial, which is projected to last three to four weeks, is less than one week away. As

of this date, Relator does not know if the newly named parties will waive service and appear

at trial, or allow a default to be taken against them. In either instance, due to the timing of

Respondent's actions, it may not be possible to develop an appellate record that adequately

preserves the defenses to the allegation that Relator is jointly and severally liable with the

newly named individuals and entities.

In the absence of a stay, the subject matter of this mandamus will be mooted by trial.

If Relator is forced to proceed to trial in this construction defect case under the theory that

it is jointly and severally liable with six unserved entities and individuals with whom it may

be adverse, its appellate rights will be compromised. Additionally, Relator will suffer

irreparable injury and overwhelming loss of resources which, in all likelihood, cannot be

fully remedied on appeal or in a subsequent proceeding.

6. Real Party in Interest Rio Grande City Consolidated Independent School

District does not agree to this motion. The remaining parties either agree to this motion or

have not responded to attempts to confer, but are believed, in good faith, to be in agreement

with this motion as set forth in the attached affidavit.

B. Argument & Authorities

7. The Court may grant temporary relief pending its determination of an original

proceeding. Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b).

8. This emergency stay is necessary to maintain the status quo of the parties and

to preserve the Court's jurisdiction to consider the merits of the original proceeding. In re

Reed, 901 S.W.2d 604,609 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1995, orig. proceeding).

9. This motion is verified by counsel for Relator.

C. Conclusion

10. Relator seeks mandamus relief to preserve its rights to develop a defense and

appellate record. In the absence of mandamus relief, Relator will be allocated liability for

individuals and entities who are not before the Court. This case is set on the court's docket

for May 11, 2015 at 9:00a.m. If stay is not granted, this mandamus will be rendered moot

by trial.

D. Prayer

11. For the reasons stated in this motion, Relator asks the Court for an emergency

stay to maintain the status quo of the parties and preserve the Court's jurisdiction to consider

the merits ofRe1ator's original proceeding.

Respectfully submitted,

COKINOS, BOSIEN & YOUNG 10999 IH-10 West, Suite 800 San Antonio, Texas 78230 (210) 293-8700 (Office) (210) 293-8733 (Fax)

Date: May4,2015 By: u~~ Karen L. Landinger State Bar No. 00787873 klandinger@cbylaw.com Stephanie O'Rourke State Bar No. 15310800 sorourke@cbylaw .com Stanley W. Curry, Jr. State Bar No. 05274000 scurry@cbylaw.com Robert M. Smith State Bar No. 18677400 rmsmith@cbylaw.com GabrielS. Head State Bar No. 24055642 ghead@cbylaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR RELATOR, DESCON CONSTRUCTION, L.P.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I ce1iify that a copy of Relator's Motion for Emergency Stay was served on the following on May 4, 2015, before 10:00 p.m. local time of the recipient as indicated:

RESPONDENT The Honorable Ana Lisa Garza District Judge 229'h Judicial District Court of Starr County Starr County Courthouse 401 N. Britton Avenue, Room 304 Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 (956) 487-2636 (Office) (956) 487-4093 (Fax) alglaw 1@aol.com asaenz@co.starr .tx. us

INTERESTED PARTIES Attorneys for Interested Party, Rio Grande City CISD Norman Jolly Michael B. Jolly Law Office of Norman Jolly 405 Main, Suite 1000 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 237-8383 (Office) (713) 237-8385 (Fax) normanjollvoc@sbcglobal.net mikejolly@aol.com lawjp@earthlink.net ericjarvis@rocketmail.com twentysixpoint2@me.com medina nancy@sbcglobal.net

Attorneys for Interested Party, Rio Grande City CISD Mmiie Garcia Vela I 00 West 5th Street Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 (956) 488-8170 (Office) (956) 488-8129 (Fax) mmiie.garcia@gmail.com

Attorneys for Interested Party, ERO International, L.L.P. John R. Griffith Griffith Law Group 801 E. Fern Avenue, Suite 170 McAllen, Texas 78501 (956) 971-9446 (Office) (956) 971-9451 (Fax) jrg@rgvfirm.com gh@rgvfirm.com

Attorneys for Interested Party, Halff Associates, Inc. and Menton J. Murray, III, P.E. Grant Gealy Mills Shirley, L.L.P. 3 Riverway, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77058 (713) 571-4206 (Office) (713) 225-0844 (Fax) ggealy@millsshirley.com psutton@millsshirley.com

Attorneys for Interested Patiy, AAS Consulting, Inc. d/b/a Advance Air Systems Douglas M. Walla Andrew M. Williams & Associates 5909 West Loop South, Suite 550 Bellaire, Texas 77401 (713) 840-7321 (Office) (713) 839-1302 (Fax) doug@amwlawfirm.com admin2@amwlawfinn.com admin1@amwlawfirm.com

Attorneys for Interested Party, C.A. Ray & Son Painting Contractors, Inc. Marc E. Villarreal R. Kyle Hinkle Hinkle & Villarreal, P.C. 719 S. Shoreline Blvd., Suite 300 Corpus Clu·isti, Texas 78401 (361) 883-0620 (Office) (361) 883-0612 (Fax) mvillarreal@southtxdefense.com rkhinkle@southtxdefense.com afrees@southtxdefense.com

Attorneys for Interested Party, Faires Plumbing Co., Inc. David J. Dunn Dunn, Weathered, Coffey, Rivera & Kasperitis, P.C. 611 S. Upper Broadway Corpus Christi, Texas 7840 I (361) 883-1594 (Office) (361) 883-1599 (Fax) Dunndj@swbell.net vanesa@dwcrk.net kellycreel@swbell.net

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Descon Construction, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in Re Descon Construction, L.P. (in Re Descon Construction, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ojeda v. Reed
901 S.W.2d 604 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)