In re Derrick T. M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Derrick T. M.

286 A.D.2d 938, 730 N.Y.S.2d 756, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8876

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 286 A.D.2d 938 (In re Derrick T. M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Derrick T. M., 286 A.D.2d 938, 730 N.Y.S.2d 756, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: On appeal from an order finding that respondent abandoned his child and terminating his parental rights on that basis (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [b]; [5]), respondent contends that he was denied procedural due process because he was not afforded the opportunity to participate meaningfully in the proceeding. Respondent’s contention is unpreserved for our review (see, [939]*939Matter of Jennifer WW., 274 AD2d 778, 779, lv denied 95 NY2d 764; Matter of Rasyn W., 270 AD2d 938, lv denied 95 NY2d 766; Matter of Derrick T., 261 AD2d 108, 109; Matter of Brian QQ., 166 AD2d 749, 750; see also, Matter of Ramon C., 261 AD2d 205; Matter of Michael Dennis C., 121 AD2d 535, 535-536, lv denied 68 NY2d 611). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Taddeo, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.) Present — Green, J. P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: On appeal from an order finding that respondent abandoned his child and terminating his parental rights on that basis (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [b]; [5]), respondent contends that he was denied procedural due process because he was not afforded the opportunity to participate meaningfully in the proceeding. Respondent’s contention is unpreserved for our review (see, [939]*939Matter of Jennifer WW., 274 AD2d 778, 779, lv denied 95 NY2d 764; Matter of Rasyn W., 270 AD2d 938, lv denied 95 NY2d 766; Matter of Derrick T., 261 AD2d 108, 109; Matter of Brian QQ., 166 AD2d 749, 750; see also, Matter of Ramon C., 261 AD2d 205; Matter of Michael Dennis C., 121 AD2d 535, 535-536, lv denied 68 NY2d 611). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Taddeo, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.) Present — Green, J. P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 938, 730 N.Y.S.2d 756, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-derrick-t-m-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack