in Re: Deric Valdez
This text of in Re: Deric Valdez (in Re: Deric Valdez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered September 1, 2016
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01036-CV
IN RE: DERIC VALDEZ, Relator
On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-07033
ORDER Upon review of the August 30, 2016 petition for writ of mandamus, it appears the
appendix and reporter’s record supporting the petition include unredacted information that
identifies the relator’s minor child. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9(a). It further appears the petition does
not comply with the requirements of rule 52 in that the documents included in the appendix are
neither sworn nor certified copies. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k); 52.7(a)(1). In addition, the petition
does not include the certification required by Rule 52.3(j), does not include the certificate of
compliance required by Rule 9.4(i)(3), and is not in 14-point font as required by Rule 9.4(e).
TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(e), 9.4(i)(3), 52.3(j).
Accordingly, we STRIKE the petition and supporting appendix. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9(b).
We grant relator leave to file a redrawn petition that complies with Rules 9.4, 9.9, and 52 of the
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on or before September 8, 2016. We caution relator that
1 failure to file a properly drawn petition as permitted by this order may result in the dismissal of
this cause without further notice.
/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Deric Valdez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-deric-valdez-texapp-2016.