In Re Dequaisa M.A. Children's Aid Society

119 A.D.3d 859, 989 N.Y.S.2d 392
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 23, 2014
Docket2013-01167
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 119 A.D.3d 859 (In Re Dequaisa M.A. Children's Aid Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Dequaisa M.A. Children's Aid Society, 119 A.D.3d 859, 989 N.Y.S.2d 392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In four related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on grounds including mental retardation, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of four orders of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Tally, J.), all dated November 30, 2012 (one as to each child), as, upon finding that she was presently and for the foreseeable future unable by reason of mental retardation to provide proper and adequate care for the subject children, terminated her parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the children to the Children’s Aid Society and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption without conducting a separate dispositional hearing.

Ordered that the appeal from the order pertaining to the child Dequaisa M.A. is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as she has since reached the age of majority (see Matter of Winston Lloyd D., 7 AD3d 706, 707 [2004]); and it is further,

Ordered that the orders pertaining to the other three children are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court, upon finding that she is presently and for the foreseeable future unable by reason of mental retardation to provide proper and adequate care for the subject children, who have been in foster care since 2008, providently exercised its discretion in freeing the children for adoption without conducting a dispositional hearing (see Matter of Joyce T., 65 NY2d 39, 46 [1985]; Matter of Joseph Lawrence S., 56 AD3d 785, 786 [2008]; Matter of Jimmy Jeremie R., 29 AD3d 913, 914 [2006]).

*860 The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Skelos, J.E, Chambers, Lott and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Marthina S. J. Z. H.-B. R. (Calvin R.)
2021 NY Slip Op 05341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Julia N.-R. (Maria R.)
2017 NY Slip Op 4848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Eliora B. (Kennedy B.)
2017 NY Slip Op 161 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A.D.3d 859, 989 N.Y.S.2d 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dequaisa-ma-childrens-aid-society-nyappdiv-2014.