In Re DePuy

90 A.2d 19, 10 N.J. 282, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 245
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 16, 1952·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This matter is before the court on the presentment of the Bergen County Committee on Ethics and Grievances and on the record of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Erom the record it appears that the respondent entered a plea of guilty to an indictment charging him with knowing and willful failure to file income tax returns for the years 1948-1949-1950. The name of the respondent will be stricken from the rolls of attorneys and coimsellors-at-law.

For disbarment — Chief Justice Vandeebilt, and Justices Heheb, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Bueling, Jacobs and Beeunaf — 7.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re DePuy, 90 A.2d 19, 10 N.J. 282, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 245 (N.J. 1952).

90 A.2d 19 (In Re DePuy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Willis
552 A.2d 979 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1989)
In Re Hynda
194 A.2d 235 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1963)
In re Alker
16 Pa. D. & C.2d 653 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1959)
State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Fitzgerald
85 N.W.2d 323 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1957)
Borough of Park Ridge v. Salimone
120 A.2d 721 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1956)
Schultz v. Hinz
90 A.2d 19 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)