In Re Dependency of Finch
189 N.E.2d 678, 40 Ill. App. 2d 18
Opinion
In the Matter of the Dependency of Leslie Finch, a Minor.
People of the State of Illinois and Mary Baldwin, Petitioners-Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
Judith Finch, Defendant-Plaintiff in Error, and Jasper S. Gullo, Defendant-Defendant in Error.
Illinois Appellate Court Third District.
Raymond L. Terrell, State's Attorney, of Springfield (Richard A. Hollis, Assistant State's Attorney, of counsel), William T. Downing, of Decatur, and J. Calvin Bostian, of Springfield, for plaintiffs in error.
Garman, Greanias & Owen, of Decatur, for defendant in error.
(Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion by JUSTICE ROETH.
Affirmed.
Not to be published in full.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Dependency of Finch, 189 N.E.2d 678, 40 Ill. App. 2d 18 (Ill. Ct. App. 1963).
189 N.E.2d 678 (In Re Dependency of Finch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Melendez
323 N.E.2d 42 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)
In Re Dependency of Bartha
230 N.E.2d 886 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1967)