Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/In Re Dependency of Finch

In Re Dependency of Finch

189 N.E.2d 678, 40 Ill. App. 2d 18
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 11, 1963
DocketGen. No. 10,408
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 189 N.E.2d 678 (In Re Dependency of Finch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Dependency of Finch, 189 N.E.2d 678, 40 Ill. App. 2d 18 (Ill. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

40 Ill. App.2d 18 (1963)
189 N.E.2d 678

In the Matter of the Dependency of Leslie Finch, a Minor.
People of the State of Illinois and Mary Baldwin, Petitioners-Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
Judith Finch, Defendant-Plaintiff in Error, and Jasper S. Gullo, Defendant-Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 10,408.

Illinois Appellate Court — Third District.

March 11, 1963.

Raymond L. Terrell, State's Attorney, of Springfield (Richard A. Hollis, Assistant State's Attorney, of counsel), William T. Downing, of Decatur, and J. Calvin Bostian, of Springfield, for plaintiffs in error.

Garman, Greanias & Owen, of Decatur, for defendant in error.

(Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion by JUSTICE ROETH.

Affirmed.

Not to be published in full.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Melendez
323 N.E.2d 42 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)
In Re Dependency of Bartha
230 N.E.2d 886 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 N.E.2d 678, 40 Ill. App. 2d 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dependency-of-finch-illappct-1963.