In re Dennis R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Dennis R.

79 A.D.2d 607, 434 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13951

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.D.2d 607 (In re Dennis R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dennis R., 79 A.D.2d 607, 434 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act to adjudge appellant to be a person in need of supervision on the ground, inter alia, that he did not attend school in accordance with article 65 of the Education Law, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 10, 1979, which, after a hearing, sustained the petition in part, and placed appellant on probation for a period of 12 months. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and petition dismissed. As the Corporation Counsel concedes with commendable candor, the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing was not sufficient to sustain a finding of truancy beyond a reasonable doubt. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act to adjudge appellant to be a person in need of supervision on the ground, inter alia, that he did not attend school in accordance with article 65 of the Education Law, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 10, 1979, which, after a hearing, sustained the petition in part, and placed appellant on probation for a period of 12 months. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and petition dismissed. As the Corporation Counsel concedes with commendable candor, the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing was not sufficient to sustain a finding of truancy beyond a reasonable doubt. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.D.2d 607, 434 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dennis-r-nyappdiv-1980.