In re Dennis

90 B.R. 607, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9121, 1988 WL 98290
District Court, W.D. New York·Decided August 17, 1988·No. Nos. CIV-87-1255E, B-84-10302 M·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ELFVIN, District Judge.

The Central Trust Company (“Central”) appeals from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Court entered July 9, 1987 dismissing the debtors’ Chapter 11 petition.1 Central, through its attorney, Paul S. Gros-chadl, Esq., avers that the debtors moved for dismissal with the intention to refile under Chapter 12. Groschadl Affidavit, ¶4. It argues that such refiling is prohibited by section 302(c)(1) of the Family Farmer Bankruptcy Act of 1986, Public Law No. 99-554.

It is the dismissal of the Chapter 11 petition, not the legality of some possible future action on the part of the debtor that is appealable. Section 302(c) does not prohibit the dismissal of a Chapter 11 petition merely because a debtor might later attempt to file under Chapter 12.2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the ORDER of dismissal entered July 9, 1987 is affirmed and that this appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Dennis, 90 B.R. 607, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9121, 1988 WL 98290 (W.D.N.Y. 1988).

90 B.R. 607 (In re Dennis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howe v. Vaughan
913 F.2d 1138 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
Howe v. Vaughan (In re Howe)
913 F.2d 1138 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)