In re Delozier

613 A.2d 196, 158 Vt. 655, 1992 Vt. LEXIS 82
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJune 18, 1992
DocketNo. 92-131
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 613 A.2d 196 (In re Delozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Delozier, 613 A.2d 196, 158 Vt. 655, 1992 Vt. LEXIS 82 (Vt. 1992).

Opinion

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted. 3 V.S.A. § 815(a) provides that appeals from preliminary, procedural and intermediate agency actions be heard by any “other court . . . expressly provided by law.” 3 V.S.A. § 130(c) provides that a party aggrieved by a decision of the appellate officer may appeal to the superior court of Washington County. Since a court other than the Supreme Court is expressly granted authority to hear appeals from decisions of the Board of Medical Practice, interlocutory appeals of preliminary, procedural or intermediate licensing board decisions must follow a similar route.

Motion to dismiss granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Libby
Vermont Superior Court, 2005
Perry v. Medical Practice Board
737 A.2d 900 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
613 A.2d 196, 158 Vt. 655, 1992 Vt. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-delozier-vt-1992.