In re Delozier

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Delozier

613 A.2d 196, 158 Vt. 655, 1992 Vt. LEXIS 82

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided June 18, 1992·No. No. 92-131·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted. 3 V.S.A. § 815(a) provides that appeals from preliminary, procedural and intermediate agency actions be heard by any “other court . . . expressly provided by law.” 3 V.S.A. § 130(c) provides that a party aggrieved by a decision of the appellate officer may appeal to the superior court of Washington County. Since a court other than the Supreme Court is expressly granted authority to hear appeals from decisions of the Board of Medical Practice, interlocutory appeals of preliminary, procedural or intermediate licensing board decisions must follow a similar route.

Motion to dismiss granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted. 3 V.S.A. § 815(a) provides that appeals from preliminary, procedural and intermediate agency actions be heard by any “other court . . . expressly provided by law.” 3 V.S.A. § 130(c) provides that a party aggrieved by a decision of the appellate officer may appeal to the superior court of Washington County. Since a court other than the Supreme Court is expressly granted authority to hear appeals from decisions of the Board of Medical Practice, interlocutory appeals of preliminary, procedural or intermediate licensing board decisions must follow a similar route.

Motion to dismiss granted.

In re Delozier, 613 A.2d 196, 158 Vt. 655, 1992 Vt. LEXIS 82 (Vt. 1992).

Pincite

613 A.2d 196 (In re Delozier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related