In re DeJean

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re DeJean

131 So. 3d 36, 2014 WL 113178, 2014 La. LEXIS 4

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 10, 2014

DocketNo. 2013-B-2311

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 So. 3d 36 (In re DeJean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re DeJean, 131 So. 3d 36, 2014 WL 113178, 2014 La. LEXIS 4 (La. 2014).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

| Respondent, Felix Anthony DeJean, IV, seeks review of a ruling of the disciplinary board imposing a public reprimand. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we find the disciplinary board reached the correct result in concluding that respondent’s conduct was prejudicial to the administration of justice. The appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct is a public reprimand.

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the ruling of the disciplinary board is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

| Respondent, Felix Anthony DeJean, IV, seeks review of a ruling of the disciplinary board imposing a public reprimand. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we find the disciplinary board reached the correct result in concluding that respondent’s conduct was prejudicial to the administration of justice. The appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct is a public reprimand.

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the ruling of the disciplinary board is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 So. 3d 36, 2014 WL 113178, 2014 La. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dejean-la-2014.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack