In Re Defelice

984 So. 2d 708, 2008 WL 2553020
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 27, 2008
Docket2008-B-1347
StatusPublished

This text of 984 So. 2d 708 (In Re Defelice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Defelice, 984 So. 2d 708, 2008 WL 2553020 (La. 2008).

Opinion

984 So.2d 708 (2008)

In re April Petry DEFELICE.

No. 2008-B-1347.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 27, 2008.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.[*]

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent engaged in a conflict of interest and engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that April Petry Defelice, Louisiana Bar Roll number 28187, be and she hereby is suspended from the practice of law for ninety days. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent's successful completion of a one-year period of supervised probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

TRAYLOR, J., would reject consent discipline.

NOTES

[*] Weimer, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
984 So. 2d 708, 2008 WL 2553020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-defelice-la-2008.