In Re Deepwater Horizon-Appeals of the Economic & Property Damage Class Action Settlement
This text of 756 F.3d 320 (In Re Deepwater Horizon-Appeals of the Economic & Property Damage Class Action Settlement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
ORDER:
The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir.- R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
In the en banc poll, five judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jolly, Jones, Clement, Owen and Elrod) and eight judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Davis, Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves and Higginson).
Judge Smith is recused and did not participate in the consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
756 F.3d 320, 2014 WL 2118614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-deepwater-horizon-appeals-of-the-economic-property-damage-class-ca5-2014.