In Re Deepwater Horizon-Appeals of the Economic & Property Damage Class Action Settlement

756 F.3d 320, 2014 WL 2118614
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2014·No. 13-30095·Published

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

ORDER:

The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir.- R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Deepwater Horizon-Appeals of the Economic & Property Damage Class Action Settlement, 756 F.3d 320, 2014 WL 2118614 (5th Cir. 2014).

756 F.3d 320 (In Re Deepwater Horizon-Appeals of the Economic & Property Damage Class Action Settlement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
521 U.S. 591 (Supreme Court, 1997)
Kohen v. Pacific Investment Management Co.
571 F.3d 672 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
523 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1998)
In Re: Deepwater Horizon
739 F.3d 790 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Denney v. Deutsche Bank AG
443 F.3d 253 (Second Circuit, 2006)