In re Decision of the State Board of Elections re Nomination Papers of Buchanan

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

In re Decision of the State Board of Elections re Nomination Papers of Buchanan

670 A.2d 1261, 1996 R.I. LEXIS 35, 1996 WL 72295

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJanuary 19, 1996

DocketNo. 96-11-M.P.

StatusPublished

This text of 670 A.2d 1261 (In re Decision of the State Board of Elections re Nomination Papers of Buchanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Decision of the State Board of Elections re Nomination Papers of Buchanan, 670 A.2d 1261, 1996 R.I. LEXIS 35, 1996 WL 72295 (R.I. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the court on the petition of Patrick J. Buchanan for a writ of certiorari to review a January 2, 1996 decision of the Rhode Island Board of Elections denying Buchanan placement on the ballot for the March 1996 Republican Presidential Preference Primary. After careful examination of the substantial memoranda filed by the parties, we conclude that review is not warranted. The board was correct in its determination that a voter, in order to be “eligible” to sign petition papers under § 17-12.1 — 1, must be registered to vote, (see § 17-1-3) The remaining challenges to the board’s decision as set forth in the petition are deemed to be without merit.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of certio-rari is denied. The stay previously issued in this matter is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter came before the court on the petition of Patrick J. Buchanan for a writ of certiorari to review a January 2, 1996 decision of the Rhode Island Board of Elections denying Buchanan placement on the ballot for the March 1996 Republican Presidential Preference Primary. After careful examination of the substantial memoranda filed by the parties, we conclude that review is not warranted. The board was correct in its determination that a voter, in order to be “eligible” to sign petition papers under § 17-12.1 — 1, must be registered to vote, (see § 17-1-3) The remaining challenges to the board’s decision as set forth in the petition are deemed to be without merit.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of certio-rari is denied. The stay previously issued in this matter is vacated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

670 A.2d 1261, 1996 R.I. LEXIS 35, 1996 WL 72295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-decision-of-the-state-board-of-elections-re-nomination-papers-of-ri-1996.