In Re Decision of Disciplinary Board No. 06-Pdb-062.
This text of 962 So. 2d 1075 (In Re Decision of Disciplinary Board No. 06-Pdb-062.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Appeal of DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 06-PDB-062.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
ORDER
On the showing made, we are unable to determine whether the disciplinary board acted arbitrarily, capriciously or unreasonably in dismissing the complaint. Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 30(C). However, given the allegations made by the complainant, we believe the disciplinary board erred in not directing that the matter be investigated further pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 30(A). Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to conduct further investigation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11(B). In its investigation, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel should review the medical records provided by complainant, as well as any other relevant evidence, before making a determination on the merits of the complaint.
/s/ Pascal F. Calogero, Jr.
Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
962 So. 2d 1075, 2007 La. LEXIS 1745, 2007 WL 2404452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-decision-of-disciplinary-board-no-06-pdb-062-la-2007.