In Re Decision of Disciplinary Board No. 06-Pdb-017

962 So. 2d 1074, 2007 La. LEXIS 1747, 2007 WL 2404446
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided August 24, 2007·No. 2007-OB-0102·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

962 So.2d 1074 (2007)

In re Appeal of DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 06-PDB-017.

No. 2007-OB-0102.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 24, 2007.

ORDER

On the showing made, we are unable to determine whether the disciplinary board acted arbitrarily, capriciously or unreasonably in dismissing the complaint. Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 30(C). However, given the allegations made by the complainant, we believe the disciplinary board erred in not directing that the matter be investigated further pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 30(A). Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to conduct further investigation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11(B). During its investigation, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel should take additional evidence, with particular emphasis on whether respondent *1075 engaged in commingling and/or conversion of client funds.

/s/ Pascal F. Calogero, Jr.

Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Decision of Disciplinary Board No. 06-Pdb-017, 962 So. 2d 1074, 2007 La. LEXIS 1747, 2007 WL 2404446 (La. 2007).

962 So. 2d 1074 (In Re Decision of Disciplinary Board No. 06-Pdb-017) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Thomas
962 So. 2d 1074 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2007)