In Re Debra v. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for Her Law Practice, the Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC And Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for Her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Debra v. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for Her Law Practice, the Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC And Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for Her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller v. the State of Texas

DecidedApril 4, 2023

Docket14-23-00212-CV

StatusPublished

This text of In Re Debra v. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for Her Law Practice, the Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC And Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for Her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller v. the State of Texas (In Re Debra v. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for Her Law Practice, the Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC And Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for Her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Debra v. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for Her Law Practice, the Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC And Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for Her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 4, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00212-CV

IN RE DEBRA V. JENNINGS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR HER LAW PRACTICE, THE LAW OFFICE OF DEBRA JENNINGS, PLLC; AND LANEASE DICKENS-FULLER, INDIVIDUALLY AS AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR HER LAW PRACTICE, LAW OFFICE OF LANEASE FULLER, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 504,405-401

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 3, 2023, relators Debra V. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for her Law Practice, The Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC; and Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller filed a petition for writ of mandamus as well as an emergency motion for temporary relief in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Jason Cox, presiding judge of the Probate Court No 3 of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s March 24, 2023 order to account and extending temporary injunction.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Additionally, all pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 4, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00212-CV

IN RE DEBRA V. JENNINGS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR HER LAW PRACTICE, THE LAW OFFICE OF DEBRA JENNINGS, PLLC; AND LANEASE DICKENS-FULLER, INDIVIDUALLY AS AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR HER LAW PRACTICE, LAW OFFICE OF LANEASE FULLER, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 504,405-401

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 3, 2023, relators Debra V. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for her Law Practice, The Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC; and Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller filed a petition for writ of mandamus as well as an emergency motion for temporary relief in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Jason Cox, presiding judge of the Probate Court No 3 of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s March 24, 2023 order to account and extending temporary injunction.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Additionally, all pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In Re Debra v. Jennings, Individually and as Representative for Her Law Practice, the Law Office of Debra Jennings, PLLC And Lanease Dickens-Fuller, Individually as as Representative for Her Law Practice, Law Office of Lanease Fuller v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-debra-v-jennings-individually-and-as-representative-for-her-law-texapp-2023.