In re Deanna S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Deanna S.

275 A.D.2d 645, 713 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10033

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 645 (In re Deanna S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Deanna S., 275 A.D.2d 645, 713 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10033 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (John Hunt, J.), entered on or about August 5, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed her on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight'of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. Notwithstanding appellant’s contentions to the contrary, the testimony unequivocally established that appellant participated in the attack by kicking the complainant as she lay on the ground. Concur — Lerner, J. P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (John Hunt, J.), entered on or about August 5, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed her on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight'of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. Notwithstanding appellant’s contentions to the contrary, the testimony unequivocally established that appellant participated in the attack by kicking the complainant as she lay on the ground. Concur — Lerner, J. P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 645, 713 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-deanna-s-nyappdiv-2000.