in Re Deandre Dynell Deboest

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 7, 2023
• Docket: 01-23-00047-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 7, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00047-CR ——————————— IN RE DEANDRE DEBOEST, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, DeAndre DeBoest, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a

petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this Court issue a writ of mandamus

directing the trial court to “[g]ive a written ruling on [his] Motion to Suppress

Evidence (Warrantless Seizure) and hold a Suppression Hearing.”1

1 The underlying case is DeAndre DeBoest v. The State of Texas, Cause No. 1792110, in the 232nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Josh Hill presiding. Our review of DeBoest’s mandamus petition reflects that DeBoest has failed

to establish that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7,

52.8; see also Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly,

we deny DeBoest’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We

dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Hightower, and Guerra.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).