In re Dean

Court of Appeals of Texas

In re Dean

393 S.W.3d 289, 2011 WL 5178341, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 8678

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 2, 2011·No. No. 05-11-01326-CV·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LANG.

Relator contends the trial judge erred in exercising jurisdiction over a child custody proceeding. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and LIFT the stay imposed by this Court’s order of October 4, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LANG.

Relator contends the trial judge erred in exercising jurisdiction over a child custody proceeding. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and LIFT the stay imposed by this Court’s order of October 4, 2011.

In re Dean, 393 S.W.3d 289, 2011 WL 5178341, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 8678 (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

393 S.W.3d 289 (In re Dean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related