in Re Dean E. Smith

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 7, 2019
Docket14-19-00106-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Dean E. Smith (in Re Dean E. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Dean E. Smith, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Amended Abatement Order filed March 7, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-19-00106-CV ____________

IN RE DEAN E. SMITH, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS On Appeal from the 257th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009-33707

AMENDED ABATEMENT ORDER

On February 7, 2019, relator Dean E. Smith filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Sandra Peake, presiding judge of the 257th Judicial District Court of Harris County, to vacate a June 1, 2018 enforcement order.

The subject order was signed by the Honorable Judy Warne, who ceased to hold office of Judge of the 257th District Court of Harris County, on January 1, 2019. Because Judge Warne ceased to hold office, we are required to abate this proceeding to permit Judge Peake to reconsider Judge Warne’s decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See Tex. R. App. 7.2(b); see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will not issue against a new judge for what a former one did.”).

On February 21, 2019, we issued an order abating this case until March 25, 2019, to permit Judge Peake to reconsider the order underlying relator’s request for relief. The parties have filed a joint motion for extension of the abatement deadline, in which they request that this court extend the deadline for Judge Peake to reconsider the order to May 3, 2019. The motion is GRANTED.

We abate this proceeding until May 3, 2019, to permit Judge Peake to reconsider the order underlying relator’s request for relief. On or before that date, Judge Peake shall advise this court of the action taken on relator’s request. This court will consider a motion to dismiss the original proceeding or a motion to reinstate the original proceeding, as appropriate. If Judge Peake does not advise this court of the action taken on relator’s request, relator and real party in interest are ordered to file a status update with this court on or before May 10, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Baylor Medical Center at Garland
280 S.W.3d 227 (Texas Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Dean E. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dean-e-smith-texapp-2019.