In re deAcosta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re deAcosta

249 A.D. 191, 291 N.Y.S. 853, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5067

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 A.D. 191 (In re deAcosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re deAcosta, 249 A.D. 191, 291 N.Y.S. 853, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The great weight of the evidence herein establishes that the respondent in May, 1932, procured one Hays R. Browning to cash a check for him in the sum of sixty dollars, and in February, 1933, gave a check for forty-two dollars to one Bertona for food and drink furnished before and at the time of the delivery of said check. Both these checks were drawn upon accounts which had been closed since 1931. The checks were not made good until after the matters had been brought to the attention of the Bar Association.

The respondent should be suspended for one year with leave to appy for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Respondent suspended for one year.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The great weight of the evidence herein establishes that the respondent in May, 1932, procured one Hays R. Browning to cash a check for him in the sum of sixty dollars, and in February, 1933, gave a check for forty-two dollars to one Bertona for food and drink furnished before and at the time of the delivery of said check. Both these checks were drawn upon accounts which had been closed since 1931. The checks were not made good until after the matters had been brought to the attention of the Bar Association.

The respondent should be suspended for one year with leave to appy for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Respondent suspended for one year.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 191, 291 N.Y.S. 853, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-deacosta-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack