In re De Sevo

158 A.3d 19, 228 N.J. 461, 2017 WL 1251107, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 380
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 5, 2017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-041, concluding that ALEXANDER RALPH DE SEVO of OAKHURST, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be censured for violating RPC 8.4(b)(commis-sion of a criminal act that reflects adversely on the attorney’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ALEXANDER RALPH DE SEVO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re De Sevo, 158 A.3d 19, 228 N.J. 461, 2017 WL 1251107, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 380 (N.J. 2017).

158 A.3d 19 (In re De Sevo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.