In re De Pietropolo

592 A.2d 214, 124 N.J. 601, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1307
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 11, 1991·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having Ordered GEORGE W. DE PIETROPOLO of PENNSAUKEN to show cause on July 9, 1991, why he should not be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law for failure to pay a sanction of $500 to the Ethics Financial Committee, as Ordered by the Court on April [602]*60230, 1991, and respondent having failed to appear on the return date of said order to show cause, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GEORGE W. DE PIETROPOLO of PENNSAUKEN is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective July 10, 1991, and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that GEORGE W. DE PIETROPOLO be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics, dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re De Pietropolo, 592 A.2d 214, 124 N.J. 601, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1307 (N.J. 1991).

592 A.2d 214 (In re De Pietropolo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.