In re De Pietropolo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re De Pietropolo

592 A.2d 214, 124 N.J. 601, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1307

DecidedJuly 11, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 592 A.2d 214 (In re De Pietropolo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re De Pietropolo, 592 A.2d 214, 124 N.J. 601, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1307 (N.J. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having Ordered GEORGE W. DE PIETROPOLO of PENNSAUKEN to show cause on July 9, 1991, why he should not be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law for failure to pay a sanction of $500 to the Ethics Financial Committee, as Ordered by the Court on April [602]*60230, 1991, and respondent having failed to appear on the return date of said order to show cause, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GEORGE W. DE PIETROPOLO of PENNSAUKEN is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective July 10, 1991, and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that GEORGE W. DE PIETROPOLO be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics, dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court having Ordered GEORGE W. DE PIETROPOLO of PENNSAUKEN to show cause on July 9, 1991, why he should not be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law for failure to pay a sanction of $500 to the Ethics Financial Committee, as Ordered by the Court on April [602]*60230, 1991, and respondent having failed to appear on the return date of said order to show cause, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that GEORGE W. DE PIETROPOLO of PENNSAUKEN is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective July 10, 1991, and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that GEORGE W. DE PIETROPOLO be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics, dealing with suspended attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 A.2d 214, 124 N.J. 601, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 1307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-de-pietropolo-nj-1991.