In re D.E.
This text of 2022 Ohio 1150 (In re D.E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re D.E., 2022-Ohio-1150.]
COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JUDGES: Hon. John W. Wise, J. IN THE MATTER OF Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., P. J. Hon. William B. Hoffman, J.
D.E. Case Nos. 21CA000029 and 21CA000030
C.E. OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, Case No. 19JC00199
JUDGMENT: Dismissed
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: April 4, 2022
APPEARANCES:
For Appellant Mother For Appellee Children's Services
JEANETTE M. MOLL MELISSA M. WILSON JEANETTE M. MOLL LLC 274 Highland Avenue P. O. Box 461 Cambridge, Ohio 43725 Zanesville, Ohio 43702
For Father For CASA
JOSHUA PAMMER CHERYL GADD 217 North 8th Street 801 Wheeling Avenue, #D102 Cambridge, Ohio 43725 Cambridge, Ohio 43725
Guardian Ad Litem
RUTH ELLEN WEAVER 542 South Drexel Avenue Bexley, Ohio 43209 Guernsey County, Case Nos. 21CA000029 and 21CA000030 2
Wise, John, J.
{¶ 1} Appellant-Mother Ashley S. appeals from the judgment entered in Guernsey
County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Court Division, which terminated all parental
rights, privileges and responsibilities of the parents with regard to the minor children D.E.
and C.E. and ordered that permanent custody of the minor children be granted to
Guernsey County Children Services (GCCS).
{¶ 2} This appeal is expedited and is being considered pursuant to
App.R.11.2(C). The relevant facts leading to this appeal are as follows:
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE
{¶ 3} For purposes of this appeal, the relevant facts and procedural history are
as follows:
{¶ 4} This appeal pertains to the permanent custody disposition of the two minor
children D.E. (dob 3/18/2014) and C.E. (dob 8/10/2016). Appellant Ashley S. and Brandon
E. are the parents of the two minor children.
{¶ 5} On May 28, 2019, Appellee Guernsey County Children Services (GCCS)
filed a Complaint alleging that C.E. and D.E. were abused, neglected and dependent
children. The trial court granted ex parte custody to the Agency on the same date
{¶ 6} By Journal Entry filed July 24, 2019, the minor children were adjudicated
dependent pursuant to R.C. §2151.04(c) and neglected pursuant to R.C. §2151.03(b).
{¶ 7} On August 23, 2019, the court held a Dispositional Hearing.
{¶ 8} By Judgment Entry filed August 30, 2019, the children were placed in the
temporary custody of the paternal grandmother, Karen S. Guernsey County, Case Nos. 21CA000029 and 21CA000030 3
{¶ 9} On November 27, 2019, a review hearing was held continuing the minor
children in the temporary custody of the paternal grandmother, Karen S.
{¶ 10} On December 3, 2019, the minor children were placed in the ex parte
custody of GCCS.
{¶ 11} On February 7, 2020, a second adjudicatory hearing was held.
{¶ 12} By Judgment Entry filed February 10, 2020, the court found the minor
children to be dependent pursuant to R.C. §2151.04(c) and continued temporary custody
to GCCS. Additionally, the Father withdrew his previously filed Motion for Legal Custody.
{¶ 13} On March 9, 2020, a second dispositional hearing was held.
{¶ 14} By Judgment Entry filed March 11, 2020, the court ordered that the children
remain in the temporary custody of GCCS.
{¶ 15} Further review hearings were held on June 30, 2020, October 1, 2020, and
December 17, 2020 (non-oral).
{¶ 16} On May 26, 2021, a Motion to Modify Dispositional Orders to that of
Permanent Custody to GCCS was filed.
{¶ 17} By Judgment Entry filed June 11, 2021, the trial court, on its own motion,
terminated the attorney for the minor children.
{¶ 18} On October 28, 2021, the Permanent Custody Hearing commenced.
Present in Court were: Attorney Melissa Wilson, representing GCCS; Staci Yakupcak,
GCCS Caseworker; Brianna Hickenbottom, GCCS Caseworker; Appellant-Mother Ashley
S.; Attorney Joshua Pammer, Counsel for father Brandon E.; Attorney Lyndsay Sullivan,
Counsel for mother; Attorney Ruthellen Weaver, GAL; Cheryl Gadd, CASA/GAL; Tom
Galbreath, Bailiff; and Jennifer Jarrett, Tayhi Video and Court Reporting. Guernsey County, Case Nos. 21CA000029 and 21CA000030 4
{¶ 19} Father Brandon E. was not present at the hearing. Father was not present
for any hearings in this case since February 7, 2020. Pursuant to testimony presented,
Father has not had any contact with his children since December 3, 2019. Father's
whereabouts are unknown and he was properly served by publication on July 8, 2021.
Attorney Pammer indicated that he had no contact with Father during the period of his
representation despite efforts to contact him using information that had been provided to
him by the court and Guernsey County Children Services
{¶ 20} By Judgment Entry filed November 10, 2021, permanent custody of the
minor children C.E. and D.E. was granted to GCCS, and the parental rights of Appellant-
Mother Ashley S. and Father Brandon E. was ordered terminated. D.E. and C.E. were
ordered committed to the Permanent Custody of GCCS.
{¶ 21} Appellant-Mother now appeals, raising the following assignments of error:
ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR
{¶ 22} "I. THE JUDGMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT THAT THE BEST
INTERESTS OF THE MINOR CHILDREN WOULD BE SERVED BY THE GRANTING
OF PERMANENT CUSTODY WAS AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT AND
SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE.
{¶ 23} “II. THERE WAS NOT CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE FOR THE
TRIAL COURT TO FIND THAT THE MINOR CHILDREN SHOULD NOT BE PLACED
WITH APPELLANT AND THAT IT WAS IN THE MINOR CHILDREN'S BEST INTEREST
TO BE PLACED IN THE PERMANENT CUSTODY OF GUERNSEY COUNTY
CHILDREN'S SERVICES. Guernsey County, Case Nos. 21CA000029 and 21CA000030 5
{¶ 24} “III. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN, DESPITE A CONFLICT
BETWEEN THE CHILDREN'S WISHES AND THEIR ALLEGED BEST INTEREST, THE
COURT FAILED TO APPOINT COUNSEL FOR THEM FOR THE PERMANENT
CUSTODY HEARING THEREBY DEPRIVING THEM OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS.”
{¶ 25} On March 9, 2022, counsel for Appellant Ashley S. filed a Suggestion of
Death notifying this Court that Ashley S. passed away on March 8, 2022, following an
automobile accident.
I., II.
{¶ 26} Before addressing the merits of Appellant’s arguments, we must address
the effect of Appellant-Mother's death on the viability of this appeal.
{¶ 27} Actions are moot when they involve no actual genuine controversy which
can definitely affect the parties' existing legal relationship. Lingo v. Ohio Central Railroad,
Inc., Franklin App. No. 05AP2006, 2006–Ohio–2268, at paragraph 20, citations deleted.
Ohio courts have long recognized a court should not entertain jurisdiction over cases
without actual controversies. Tschantz v. Ferguson (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 131, 566
N.E.2d 655.
{¶ 28} We find that the case sub judice became moot when Ashley S. died on
March 8, 2022. In her appeal, Ashley S. specifically asked this Court to find that the trial
court erred in terminating her parental rights and granting permanent custody to GCCS
and asks that her legal rights to custody be restored.
{¶ 29} Here, Ashley S.'s death makes it impossible for her to gain custody of the
children. Guernsey County, Case Nos. 21CA000029 and 21CA000030 6
{¶ 30} If while an action is pending, an event occurs that renders it impossible for
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 Ohio 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-de-ohioctapp-2022.