In re De Leeuw

98 F. 408, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 23, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BROWN, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). X have considerable doubt whether the facts in evidence show a legally coil summated gift, or transfer of the 204 shares to Mrs. De Leeuw. But even if not legally sufficient, I am of opinion that the contrary construction and supposition of the bankrupt is not shown to be knowingly false, such as to constitute a criminal offense, or a false oath.

Discharge granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re De Leeuw, 98 F. 408, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251 (S.D.N.Y. 1899).

98 F. 408 (In re De Leeuw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Servel
30 F.2d 102 (D. Idaho, 1928)