In re De Leeuw

S.D. New York

In re De Leeuw

98 F. 408, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 98 F. 408 (In re De Leeuw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re De Leeuw, 98 F. 408, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251 (S.D.N.Y. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). X have considerable doubt whether the facts in evidence show a legally coil summated gift, or transfer of the 204 shares to Mrs. De Leeuw. But even if not legally sufficient, I am of opinion that the contrary construction and supposition of the bankrupt is not shown to be knowingly false, such as to constitute a criminal offense, or a false oath.

Discharge granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). X have considerable doubt whether the facts in evidence show a legally coil summated gift, or transfer of the 204 shares to Mrs. De Leeuw. But even if not legally sufficient, I am of opinion that the contrary construction and supposition of the bankrupt is not shown to be knowingly false, such as to constitute a criminal offense, or a false oath.

Discharge granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 F. 408, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-de-leeuw-nysd-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack