In re De Leeuw
98 F. 408, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251
Opinion
(after stating the facts as above). X have considerable doubt whether the facts in evidence show a legally coil summated gift, or transfer of the 204 shares to Mrs. De Leeuw. But even if not legally sufficient, I am of opinion that the contrary construction and supposition of the bankrupt is not shown to be knowingly false, such as to constitute a criminal offense, or a false oath.
Discharge granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re De Leeuw, 98 F. 408, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251 (S.D.N.Y. 1899).
98 F. 408 (In re De Leeuw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Servel
30 F.2d 102 (D. Idaho, 1928)