In re De La Reza

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re De La Reza

749 A.2d 830, 163 N.J. 399, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 521

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 2, 2000·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that MERCEDES DE LA REZA of HACK-ENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, [400] should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest), and that respondent should practice under supervision for a period of one year, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MERCEDES DE LA REZA is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that MERCEDES DE LA REZA of HACK-ENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, [400] should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest), and that respondent should practice under supervision for a period of one year, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MERCEDES DE LA REZA is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re De La Reza, 749 A.2d 830, 163 N.J. 399, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 521 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

749 A.2d 830 (In re De La Reza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.