In re De La Carrera

856 A.2d 26, 181 N.J. 296, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1044
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 9, 2004·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-116, concluding that ANTONIO M. De La CARRERA of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of funds), RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping deficiencies), RPC 4.1(a)(1) (false statement of material fact to third person), RPC 4.1(a)(2) (failure to disclose material fact to third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client), RPC 8.4(a) (violating Rules of Professional Conduct), and RPC 8.4(c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTONIO M. De La CARRERA is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in ' the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re De La Carrera, 856 A.2d 26, 181 N.J. 296, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1044 (N.J. 2004).

856 A.2d 26 (In re De La Carrera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.