In Re De Febio
This text of 74 S.E.2d 531 (In Re De Febio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment appealed from was entered, by consent, at the June Term, 1952, of Pasquotank, as of the May Term, 1952, of Dare.
The transcript of the record was not docketed here until 6 December, 1952. It was the duty of the appellants to docket the appeal at the Fall Term, 1952, of this Court, twenty-one days before the call of the docket of the First District, to which the case belongs. Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 546, as amended. See 233 N.C. 749.
This is a mandatory rule of procedure with us. It may not be abrogated by consent or otherwise. Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126. Failure to docket within the time prescribed works a loss of the right of appeal and necessitates dismissal. Jones v. Jones, 232 N.C. 518, 61 S.E. 2d 335; S. v. Presnell, 226 N.C. 160, 36 S.E. 2d 927; S. v. Watson, 208 N.C. 70, 179 S.E. 455; Pruitt v. Wood, supra.
It follows that the appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered. This, of course, without prejudice to respondents’ rights to move, if so advised, in the Juvenile Court of Dare County for modification of the judgment on the ground of changed conditions. G.S. 110-36.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 S.E.2d 531, 237 N.C. 269, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-de-febio-nc-1953.