In re De Castanos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re De Castanos

66 A.D.2d 640, 414 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10063

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.2d 640 (In re De Castanos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re De Castanos, 66 A.D.2d 640, 414 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in this Department in 1942. On or about October 13, 1978, respondent was convicted in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York, by plea of guilty, of the felony of conspiracy to transport and sell stolen securities (US Code, tit 18, [641]*641§ 371), a Federal felony (US Code, tit 18, § 1), and sentenced thereon to probation for two years, resulting in his automatic disbarment (Judiciary Law, §90, subd 4; Matter of Chu, 42 NY2d 490; Matter of Thies, 45 NY2d 865). The Departmental Disciplinary Committee moves accordingly to strike his name from the roll of attorneys. The application is granted.

Respondent’s name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Markewich and Bloom, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in this Department in 1942. On or about October 13, 1978, respondent was convicted in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York, by plea of guilty, of the felony of conspiracy to transport and sell stolen securities (US Code, tit 18, [641]*641§ 371), a Federal felony (US Code, tit 18, § 1), and sentenced thereon to probation for two years, resulting in his automatic disbarment (Judiciary Law, §90, subd 4; Matter of Chu, 42 NY2d 490; Matter of Thies, 45 NY2d 865). The Departmental Disciplinary Committee moves accordingly to strike his name from the roll of attorneys. The application is granted.

Respondent’s name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Markewich and Bloom, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.2d 640, 414 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-de-castanos-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack