In re "DD"

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re "DD"

48 A.D.2d 956, 369 N.Y.S.2d 232, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10246

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 12, 1975·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order, Family Court, St. Lawrence County (Follett, J.), entered on September 14, 1971, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Greenblott, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Herlihy, P. J., concurs in the following memorandum in which Greenblott and Main, JJ., concur. Herlihy, P. J. (concurring). The facts in this proceeding justify resort to the use of section 611 of the Family Court Act, however, I would caution that the section itself is extremely harsh and seems contrary to human instincts and should only be implemented under the most stringent circumstances.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, St. Lawrence County (Follett, J.), entered on September 14, 1971, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Greenblott, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Herlihy, P. J., concurs in the following memorandum in which Greenblott and Main, JJ., concur. Herlihy, P. J. (concurring). The facts in this proceeding justify resort to the use of section 611 of the Family Court Act, however, I would caution that the section itself is extremely harsh and seems contrary to human instincts and should only be implemented under the most stringent circumstances.

In re "DD", 48 A.D.2d 956, 369 N.Y.S.2d 232, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

48 A.D.2d 956 (In re "DD") — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related