In re D.D.

558 S.E.2d 867, 354 N.C. 572
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 18, 2001·No. No. 625P01·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion by Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 18 December 2001. Petition by juvenile appellant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 31 denied 18 December 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re D.D., 558 S.E.2d 867, 354 N.C. 572 (N.C. 2001).

558 S.E.2d 867 (In re D.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowman v. Cox Toyota Scion
737 S.E.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2012)