In Re: D.C.D. of: Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In Re: D.C.D. of: Commonwealth

134 A.3d 50, 635 Pa. 208, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 566

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 29, 2016·No. 773 MAL 2015 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29 day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

*209 (1) In interpreting Juvenile Court Rules 631 and 632; does a Juvenile Court abuse its discretion when it terminates delinquency supervision of a Juvenile Sex Offender early, despite also making a contemporaneous finding that the juvenile has a need for continued supervision and treatment requiring placement at a residential treatment facility based upon the escalating violations of sexually offending other patients while in a different Residential Treatment Facility.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29 day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

*209 (1) In interpreting Juvenile Court Rules 631 and 632; does a Juvenile Court abuse its discretion when it terminates delinquency supervision of a Juvenile Sex Offender early, despite also making a contemporaneous finding that the juvenile has a need for continued supervision and treatment requiring placement at a residential treatment facility based upon the escalating violations of sexually offending other patients while in a different Residential Treatment Facility.

In Re: D.C.D. of: Commonwealth, 134 A.3d 50, 635 Pa. 208, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 566 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

134 A.3d 50 (In Re: D.C.D. of: Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related