In re D.C.
769 S.E.2d 626, 367 N.C. 489, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 760
This text of 769 S.E.2d 626 (In re D.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re D.C., 769 S.E.2d 626, 367 N.C. 489, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 760 (N.C. 2014).
Opinion
ORDER
Petitioner’s Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of our decision in In re L.M.T., No. 40PA13 (20 December 2013).
For the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
769 S.E.2d 626, 367 N.C. 489, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dc-nc-2014.