In re D.C.

769 S.E.2d 626, 367 N.C. 489, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 760
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 11, 2014·No. No. 523P13·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner’s Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of our decision in In re L.M.T., No. 40PA13 (20 December 2013).

s/Beaslev. J.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re D.C., 769 S.E.2d 626, 367 N.C. 489, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 760 (N.C. 2014).

769 S.E.2d 626 (In re D.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.