in Re: Daymeon Bradford
This text of in Re: Daymeon Bradford (in Re: Daymeon Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed April 24, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00407-CV
IN RE DAYMEON BRADFORD, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On April 11, 2003, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court asking that we compel the Harris County District Clerk to file his petition for divorce. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.
We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221(a) (courts of appeals have jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus against district court judges or county court judges); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding) (court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus against district clerk unless necessary to enforce its jurisdiction).
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Opinion filed April 24, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Daymeon Bradford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-daymeon-bradford-texapp-2003.