In re Day

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Day

87 A.3d 237, 217 N.J. 280, 2014 WL 1415223, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 389

DecidedApril 10, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.3d 237 (In re Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Day, 87 A.3d 237, 217 N.J. 280, 2014 WL 1415223, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 389 (N.J. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-244, concluding that NEIL M. DAY, formerly of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1998, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that NEIL M. DAY is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective May 7, 2014, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-244, concluding that NEIL M. DAY, formerly of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1998, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that NEIL M. DAY is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective May 7, 2014, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.3d 237, 217 N.J. 280, 2014 WL 1415223, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-day-nj-2014.