In re Davontae D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Davontae D.

62 A.D.3d 1251, 877 N.Y.S.2d 724

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 A.D.3d 1251 (In re Davontae D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Davontae D., 62 A.D.3d 1251, 877 N.Y.S.2d 724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Marilyn L. O’Connor, J.), entered September 6, 2007 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, terminated respondent’s parental rights.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights with respect to her five children pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b based upon a finding that she had permanently neglected them. We conclude that Family Court abused its discretion in entering the order upon the mother’s default after granting the motion of the mother’s attorney to withdraw [1252]*1252as counsel without notice to the mother (see CPLR 321 [b] [2]; Family Ct Act § 165 [b]; Matter of Hohenforst v DeMagistris, 44 AD3d 1114, 1116 [2007]; Matter of Michael W., 239 AD2d 865 [1997]). “Because the purported withdrawal of counsel in this case was ineffective, the order entered by Family Court was improperly entered as a default order and appeal therefrom is not precluded” (Matter of Tierra C., 227 AD2d 994, 995 [1996]; see Matter of Kwasi S., 221 AD2d 1029 [1995]). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Family Court for reassignment of counsel and a new hearing on the petition. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Garni, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Marilyn L. O’Connor, J.), entered September 6, 2007 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, terminated respondent’s parental rights.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights with respect to her five children pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b based upon a finding that she had permanently neglected them. We conclude that Family Court abused its discretion in entering the order upon the mother’s default after granting the motion of the mother’s attorney to withdraw [1252]*1252as counsel without notice to the mother (see CPLR 321 [b] [2]; Family Ct Act § 165 [b]; Matter of Hohenforst v DeMagistris, 44 AD3d 1114, 1116 [2007]; Matter of Michael W., 239 AD2d 865 [1997]). “Because the purported withdrawal of counsel in this case was ineffective, the order entered by Family Court was improperly entered as a default order and appeal therefrom is not precluded” (Matter of Tierra C., 227 AD2d 994, 995 [1996]; see Matter of Kwasi S., 221 AD2d 1029 [1995]). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Family Court for reassignment of counsel and a new hearing on the petition. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Garni, Green and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.3d 1251, 877 N.Y.S.2d 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-davontae-d-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack